I was really peeved at initial, immediately after been coaching and studying digital art since I was 15 (28 now). I not too long ago received flack from a writer about applying the digital medium, saying that digital artists can in no way be as excellent as the classic equivalent, which frustrates me. Craig Mullins and Jaime Jones stand as testaments of persons who can cross these bounderies effortlessly, and these sort of comments sound to me as elitist remarks, but only for the sake of elitism and do tend to come from people who don’t normally paint.
Oh I’m doing a module on this at University, just for the reason that it really is digital does not make it any much less art in my opinion, there is a statue of a horse in the center of London that was sculpted by Scott Eaton in zBrush and 3d printed and I can guarantee people today would accept it as art, but if they have been told how it was made, their opinions would modify.
I know, all you guys have noticed is significantly of my digital art, but don’t be concerned, I essentially do draw with pencils and pens. They saw how rapid art could be created, and to me, I think that intimidated them. Persons saying digital art wasn’t genuine, and that persons just cheated when they utilized it, bashing with each other images and what not. It reminded me of comments on websites and blogs, bashing realistic paintings and so forth.